Eggs, Gender Roles, and Inclusion - A Response to "100 Skills Every Man Should Know"

While reading through the list of 100 Skills Every Man Should Know from the Art of Manliness, I came upon list item 41. and knew immediately that this was the skill that I wanted to demonstrate. The skill, which simply reads "Cook Eggs" in the article, immediately struck me with so many different thoughts and personal associations. Firstly, I love eggs and had already been planning on making them the next morning before even reading the article. Secondly, growing up it was always a running joke in my family that the only time you would ever catch my dad cooking food for us was if he was making breakfast, particularly his egg sandwiches. Meanwhile, my mother never once made us breakfast and stuck to solely making us lunch and dinner. I'm not entirely sure how or why this strict division of mealtime labor between my parents came about, but regardless of the origin it has definitely led me to create an association between cooking breakfast food for your family and  "manliness" in my brain. So, when I saw that eggs made the 100 skills list, and then saw the line in the description that read "If you can master a few ways to cook eggs, you'll be a breakfast aficionado who will wow your significant other or your kids, depending on your station in life." I felt a sense of childhood nostalgia and connection. 



While making these eggs for myself, I was reminded of the sense of independence that cooking brings me. There's something so reassuring and comforting about making a hot breakfast for yourself, and it really does make me feel like an adult who can take care of herself. And, making breakfast, especially eggs, for someone else makes me feel like I'm taking care and providing for whoever I am making the eggs for. It feels like an act of love, making someone else something so warm and easy to eat on a sleepy morning. I really think that my dad wanted us to feel taken care of, and so he made us lots and lots of eggs. 

I think this skill was included in the 100 skills list for that very reason. Eggs are something you can make for a loved one and really "wow" them, as the article puts it. It can be a way to either impress others, or make them feel provided for, which are two actions that are very reminiscent of traditional, stereotypical male roles in society. 

I struggle to recommend that this traditionally domestic skill be added to our hypothetical 100 Skills Every Woman Should Know list, because for far too many centuries the role of egg maker was relegated almost solely to women. But, on the other hand, I can't deny the sense of independence and empowerment that making eggs brings me personally. For me, simple domestic tasks are so inextricably tied to my conceptions of adulthood and independence, which are two things I value highly as a young adult. Because of these conflicting feelings, I think the best spot for "41. Cooking Eggs" to fall would be the 100 Skills Every Human Should Know list, because the ability to cook eggs for both yourself and others is a joy that I believe should be universally experienced. 

As for the remainder of our hypothetical 100 Skills Every Woman Should Know and our 100 Skills Every Human Should Know lists, I think nearly all the skills on the original 100 Skills Every Man Should Know list are applicable and would even be very beneficial for all people to know. I enjoyed and agreed with the point that Dr. Nora made on her blog post that even list item 1., "Tie a Necktie," is applicable and useful for many women and nonbinary people who wear neckties. Even personally, as a woman who has never worn a necktie before, I have still been in situations where someone, often a young child, needed help tying a necktie, and it would have come in handy for me to know how. This same logic applies for 32. "Buy a Suit". 

One final point that I took away from this article was that I found it to be heavily focused on skills that require a particularly strong and able body. This includes skills such as "16. Do a Deadlift Properly," "20. Throw a Spiral," "22. Split Firewood," "33. Swim the Front Stroke," "38. Do a Proper Pull-Up," and "44. Do a Front Dive," just to name a few. I think these list items are likely relics of the dated gender stereotype that men need to be fit and strong in order to be "real men". While I do agree that these skills are wonderful things to be able to do if you are able, I don't agree with the implication that the ability to do these things are things that every man, or human, for that matter needs to be able to do in order to be "competent and effective," as the article claims. I think a simple remedy for this would be either removing these physical fitness skills from all three of our hypothetical lists. Or, if we wanted to maintain these list items, the problem could be solved by simply reframing of the article title to something more inclusive, such as "100 Useful Skills for Humans to Know," which would eliminate the words "every" and "man". 

Comments

  1. Hey Christina! First of all, I'd like to say that those eggs look delicious and I hope you can make me some in the near future. The story of your dad always cooking eggs for you in the morning was really heartfelt and I found myself smiling through the beginning of your post. I agree that cooking is an act of love, as my parents always cook for me when I'm home for college and I think that is how they show their affection. I can see how eggs, or any meal, can impress people and and make them feel cared for, which I think would be a nice gesture for anyone regardless of gender. I am also hesitant to put this on the 100 Skills Every Woman Should Know list because cooking has always been viewed as a traditionally female task to do, but I think it is important for everyone to know how to do. As I'm noticing with my new townhouse, feeding myself and cooking does give me a sense of independence and makes me feel like an adult. I also noticed the pattern of the article focusing on skills that require a strong and able body as you said, which I don't think should be restricted to men as they do not need to have all of those skills to feel like real men.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First of all I would like to second Ashna's claim that those eggs look incredible! I totally relate to breakfast being the meal that dad cooked, while mom covered lunch and dinner, as it was the same in my house for most of my childhood. Your make a great point in bringing up how many of the things on the list can be beneficial to anyone regardless of gender identity. You're recreate the list as one that is not just inclusive in terms of gender, but also in terms of physical ability is also much appreciated and further highlights how the original list was exclusionary in a way that I did not initially think about.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a really great post. I love how you skillfully bring out this tripartite dynamic between the satisfaction and feeling of independence that cooking eggs can bring, the stereotypes involving women in the kitchen, and the separation of cooking duties in your family's household growing up.

    I think that scrambled eggs was the first thing that I was taught/allowed to cook by myself as a kid growing up. Both my mom and dad love to cook, are really great at it, and have spent a lot of time teaching me and cooking with me. (I've spent a lot of time stirring risotto for my dad...) And it is interesting how different people have their own special ways of cooking eggs that are quite personal! I'm thinking of my friend Josh who learned to make perfect poached eggs from his longtime girlfriend, my relative who has a particular omelet-like technique for making scrambled eggs, my friend Katie's method for timing hard-boiled eggs (which her mother disagrees with, but which I think is exactly right and have adopted), or my friend's son who makes fried eggs for all his younger siblings. I'm also reminded of this song, which I love, by Sudan Archives titled "Oatmeal", check it out: https://youtu.be/OApqWqSY9Kw

    I second Ashna and Aidan's comments about how helpful it was that you drew attention the problematic emphasis on certain kinds of physical ability in the original AoM list. I think I'm probably guilty of that too in my post in this topic as I mention swimming as something that I think would be empowering for anyone. What do you think: would swimming be empowering for anyone, although being able to swim is not necessary for everyone to be empowered? That still doesn't sit quite right...your thoughts would be appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a really interesting way to phrase the question! I don't think it has a simple answer either, and would maybe add the clarifying phrase "swimming holds the potential to be an empowering activity for those who can, although being able to swim is not necessary for everyone to be empowered"? Definitely a difficult question, especially because inclusion and language have such a complex and interrelated relationship.

      Delete
    2. That's helpful, thank you. Presumably some action can only actually be empowering for a person when that person can actually perform that action. But think of X, who doesn't swim now, but could learn. I would want to say that even though X can't swim, it would still be empowering. But that seems different than saying it would be empowering for Y, who has had a very serious spinal cord injury and lost control over all limbs. That said, abilities can change over time due to availability of technologies and strategies. There is something interesting going on here with modal language and the issue of abilities here...we'll have to find a philosopher of disability and a philosopher of language and ask them about it...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts